14545 Giocatori online!
Uomo vs. Macchina
Partite a turni quando vuoi!
Vota la miglior mossa vincente!
Hai ciò che serve?
Affina la tua visione tattica!
Consigli e dritte sul gioco!
Impara dai migliori giocatori!
Milioni di grandi partite!
Il tuo allenatore virtuale!
Perfeziona le tue aperture!
Confrontati con il computer!
Trova l’allenatore giusto!
Riesci a risolverlo ogni giorno?
Riassembla il tutto!
Principiante? Comincia qui!
Fai amicizia e gioca in squadra!
Notizie dal mondo degli scacchi!
Cerca tra gli iscritti a Chess.com
Trova circoli ed eventi in zona!
Chi è il migliore tra i tuoi amici?
Leggi cosa dicono gli iscritti!
I had this position in an OTB game:
(I was black)
that is basically an Alapin a tempo down.
The decision I had to make was to either develop my lsB outside of my "pawn chain" (e6), or to leave it closed in by playing e6.
I went for Bg4 because I thought it made sense to pin and eventually trade the knight on f3, because it's the main defender of the IQP. However my opponent simply played Be2, and when the trade occurred his bishop on f3 was really strong against my queenside weak light squares.
In the post game analysis he told me he just didn't like this move, because of the weaknesses left behind on b7.
So, in general what should I do with my light square bishop against the IQP?
This is not an IQP yet, right ?
Both developments are playable (Bg4 or Bb7), but if you play Bg4, you don't want to trade on f3 (the only exception might be if you can anchor a strong Knight on d4). You just keep the pressure and wait for white to commit.
Tha advantage of the pressure with Bg4 is that white must be careful about his d4 pawn, and his LS bishop can't take an agressive posture on d3 or c4.
Here is an example from the regular Alapin :
This isn't an iqp. It potentially is, but can be avoided.
The position is open, and likely to become more so, so trading a bishop for a knight is probably a bad idea on general principles unless you have a clear specific reason for it.
"Reykjavik Open, Round 5 | Commentary by FM Ingvar Johannesson & Fiona Steil-Antoni"
Blitz Vs Bullet Competition
da bjohn1234 3 minuti fa
Is this a strategy?
da Sred 3 minuti fa
A Missed Opportunity of Winning
da dashkee94 3 minuti fa
Is this position legal?
da TBentley 4 minuti fa
Rate the avatar above - II ( The return)
da VULPES_VULPES 5 minuti fa
I need your help winning a bet
da TurboFish 6 minuti fa
3/7/2014 - Mate in 4
da requester69 6 minuti fa
Creating traps vs positional play
da Yaroslavl 7 minuti fa
Nice checkmate in 2
da Black_Locust 8 minuti fa
Difference in ranking between standard, blitz/bullet and tactics trainer
da Josimar73 11 minuti fa
Perchè iscriversi | Temi scacchistici |
Domande frequenti |
Aiuto e supporto |
Mappa del sito
Informativa sulla privacy |
Note legali |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Scacchi - Italiano
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!